Ask Google “what is mythology,” and you’ll find dozens of definitions. Merriam-Webster calls it “an allegorical narrative.” Dictionary.com says it’s “a body of myths.” Wikipedia offers detailed etymology and historical development.
All technically accurate. All profoundly incomplete.
Because when you define mythology only through Western academic frameworks when your reference points are Greek and Roman narratives filtered through European scholarship you miss something essential. You miss the fact that for billions of people, what the West calls “mythology” is not myth at all.
It’s Itihasa. It’s Purana. It’s living knowledge that shapes how people understand existence, ethics, and identity.
After spending years excavating the Goddess tradition from layers of patriarchal and colonial interpretation, I’ve learned this: the question “what is mythology?” cannot be answered neutrally. Every definition carries assumptions about truth, culture, and power.
So let me offer you a definition that doesn’t start in ancient Greece or medieval Europe.
Let me tell you what mythology is from the perspective of someone who grew up with it not as an academic subject but as lived reality.
The Western Definition (And What It Misses)
Before we can move beyond Western frameworks, we need to understand what those frameworks are.
The Standard Definition
If you consult any English dictionary, mythology means:
1. A collection of myths – the body of traditional narratives belonging to a particular culture
2. The study of myths – the academic field analyzing how myths function
3. Widely held but false beliefs – as in “that’s just mythology”
This third meaning reveals the problem. In modern English usage, “mythology” has absorbed the connotation that what it describes is not true.
When scholars classify narratives as “mythology,” they’re often making an implicit judgment: these stories are culturally interesting but factually false. They’re not history. They’re not science. They’re… myths.
What This Framework Assumes
The Western definition of mythology rests on specific assumptions:
1. Truth is primarily empirical. If something can’t be verified through scientific method or historical evidence, it’s suspect.
2. “Mythology” is what other people have. Notice how we say “Greek mythology” and “Norse mythology” but not “Christian mythology.” The term is reserved for narratives from cultures that no longer hold political power or for traditions the definer doesn’t personally believe in.
3. Mythology is a historical artifact. It’s something ancient people created to explain what they didn’t understand. Now that we have science, we don’t need mythology anymore except as cultural curiosity or literary inspiration.
4. The sacred and the fictional are opposites. Either a narrative is true (factual, historical, scientific) or its mythology (symbolic, fictional, primitive).
These assumptions aren’t universal. They’re specific to a certain intellectual tradition, one shaped by the European Enlightenment, by Christianity’s relationship with pre-Christian narratives, and by colonialism’s encounter with non-European cultures.
What Mythology Actually Is (A Broader View)
So if we step outside Western frameworks, what is mythology?
Here’s my understanding, shaped by decades of working with these narratives:
Mythology is the way cultures encode their deepest insights about existence in forms that can be remembered, transmitted, and lived.
Not “false stories ancient people told before science.”
Not “primitive attempts to explain natural phenomena.”
But sophisticated philosophical systems that use narrative and symbol to convey truths that are existential rather than empirical.
Mythology as Meaning-Making
Every human society faces the same fundamental questions:
- Where did we come from?
- Why do we suffer?
- How should we live?
- What happens when we die?
- What gives life meaning?
Empirical science can’t answer these questions. They’re not questions about how the world works mechanically. They’re questions about purpose, value, ethics, the domain of meaning, not measurement.
Mythology is how cultures address these questions.
The Greek myths explored fate, hubris, the relationship between mortals and gods. They asked: Are we free, or are our lives predetermined? What happens when we challenge divine order? How do we live with the knowledge that we’re mortal?
Norse mythology grappled with cosmic cycles of destruction and renewal, with Ragnarok as the inevitable end and new beginning. It asked: If everything ends, what makes life meaningful? How do we face our own extinction?
Indian Puranas encoded insights about consciousness (Atman), ultimate reality (Brahman), cosmic order (Dharma), and the cycles of creation and dissolution. They asked: What is the self? What is the relationship between individuals and the cosmos? How do we break free from suffering?
These aren’t primitive questions. They’re the questions every human being still faces.
And the answers mythology offers aren’t literal descriptions. They’re frameworks, ways of thinking, ways of orienting yourself in an uncertain world.
Mythology as Cultural Memory
Mythology also preserves how cultures think, not just what they think.
When I read the Devi Mahatmyam, a 1,500-year-old text about the Goddess defeating demons, I’m not encountering a historical account of battles. I’m encountering a worldview that centers feminine power as the source of creation.
This worldview was later marginalized. Patriarchal interpretations pushed the Goddess to the margins. Colonial scholars labeled it “mythology” (implying falsehood). But the text survived.
And in that survival, it preserves memory. Not of events, but of possibility. The knowledge that there was a time when the Divine Feminine was not a consort but creator. Not derivative but source.
This is what mythology does. It preserves ways of thinking that might otherwise be lost.
How Different Cultures Understand Their Own Narratives
Here’s where it gets interesting. The word “mythology” is English. It’s a category imposed from outside.
When you ask cultures how they understand their own narratives, the answers vary:
India: Itihasa and Purana
In Sanskrit, there’s no exact equivalent to “mythology.”
For the epics Ramayana and Mahabharata the term is Itihasa, which literally means “it happened thus.” Not “we made this up.” Not “this is symbolic.” But “this is how it was.”
For the cosmological and theological texts the eighteen Mahapuranas and countless minor Puranas the term is Purana, meaning “ancient knowledge” or “old narrative.”
Notice the framing. These aren’t called “myths” by the cultures that produced them. They’re called history (Itihasa) and knowledge (Purana).
Does that mean every detail is historically accurate in the modern Western sense? Not necessarily. But it means these narratives were understood as conveying truth not empirical truth in every detail, but existential truth about how reality works.
When colonial scholars translated these texts and labeled them “Hindu mythology,” they imported a framework that was foreign to the material itself.
Indigenous Traditions: Dreamtime, Orisha, Kami
Look at Australian Aboriginal cultures. What Westerners call “mythology,” Aboriginal peoples call Dreamtime the foundational reality from which the physical world emerges. Not past. Not fiction. But the underlying sacred dimension of existence.
In Yoruba tradition, what gets categorized as “mythology” is the understanding of Orisha divine forces that manifest in nature and human life. Not “gods” in the Western sense. Not characters in stories. But principles are made personal.
In Shinto, Kami are sacred forces inherent in nature in mountains, rivers, trees, ancestors. Western scholars call Shinto narratives “Japanese mythology.” But from within the tradition, these aren’t myths. They’re recognitions of the sacred in the everyday.
The pattern repeats: cultures have their own frameworks for understanding their narratives. “Mythology” is what outsiders call it.
Mythology vs History: A False Binary
One reason the Western definition of mythology fails is that it creates a false opposition between mythology and history.
Either something really happened (history) or it didn’t (mythology).
But this binary doesn’t work for most of human culture.
Historical Cores, Mythological Accretions
Many narratives categorized as “mythology” likely have historical cores actual events, actual people that have been elaborated, symbolized, and mythologized over time.
Did Troy exist? Yes. Archaeology confirms it. Did the Trojan War happen? Probably something did. Is the Iliad a historically accurate account? No. It’s a mythological elaboration of historical events.
Did King Arthur exist? Maybe. There might have been a Romano-British military leader. Is the Matter of Britain historically accurate? No. It’s a myth built on possible history.
Did Rama exist? Was there a Kurukshetra war? These are questions that archaeology and historical research can partially address. But whether or not every detail of the Ramayana and Mahabharata is historically accurate doesn’t determine whether these texts are “true” in the mythological sense.
Because mythology isn’t about documenting what happened. It’s about preserving meaning.
Mythology as a Different Kind of Truth
Here’s what Western academic frameworks struggle to grasp:
Mythology deals with a different category of truth than empirical fact.
When the Devi Mahatmyam describes the Goddess manifesting as Durga to defeat Mahishasura, the question “did this literally happen?” misses the point.
The text is conveying insights about:
- The moment when patience ends and resistance begins
- The concentrated power that arises in crisis
- The defeat of ego (symbolized by the buffalo demon)
- The ultimate reality of feminine power
These truths are real. They’re existentially and philosophically real. Whether or not a ten-armed goddess literally fought a buffalo-headed demon 5,000 years ago is irrelevant to the truths the narrative conveys.
This is what I mean when I say I’m separating myth from mythology. Myth, in modern usage, means falsehood. Mythology means meaning-making. The two are not the same.
Why the Western Definition Matters (And Causes Harm)
You might think: “This is all academic. Who cares whether we call it mythology or something else?”
But definitions shape perception. And perception shapes preservation.
The Erosion of Cultural Confidence
When young Indians grow up learning that their traditions are “Hindu mythology,” they internalize a hierarchy.
Greek and Roman narratives? Also “mythology.” But at least they’re recognized as foundational to Western civilization, studied in universities, referenced in literature.
Indian narratives? “Mythology” in the sense of “those quaint stories backward people believed before they were enlightened.”
The term itself carries colonial weight. And that weight erodes cultural confidence.
I’ve met countless young Indians who know more about Zeus than about Vishnu, more about Thor than about Shiva. Not because Greek or Norse narratives are inherently more interesting. But because those narratives are presented as classics, while Indian narratives are presented as mythology implicitly, as less serious.
The Flattening of Philosophical Depth
When everything is lumped under “mythology,” the philosophical depth gets erased.
The Upanishads are not mythology in any sense. They’re philosophy. Pure metaphysical inquiry into the nature of reality, consciousness, and liberation.
The Bhagavad Gita is not mythology. It’s an ethical philosophy set in a narrative frame.
The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali are not mythology. They’re systematic psychology and phenomenology.
But all of these get casually referred to as “Hindu mythology” or “from Indian mythology” because they’re associated with a tradition that Westerners have categorized as mythological.
The flattening is profound. Complex philosophical systems get reduced to “ancient myths.”
Reclaiming How We Define Mythology
So what’s the solution?
I’m not suggesting we abandon the word “mythology” entirely. It’s too embedded in English to replace.
But we can use it more carefully. More precisely. With awareness of what it obscures.
Use “Mythology” for Systems, Not Stories
When you’re referring to an interconnected body of narratives Greek mythology, Norse mythology, Hindu mythology the term can be appropriate.
But recognize that you’re using an English category that might not align with how the culture understands its own material.
Distinguish Between Dead and Living Mythologies
Greek and Norse mythologies are, for the most part, dead. They’re no longer lived religious frameworks for anyone. They’re historical and literary material.
Hindu, Buddhist, Shinto, and Indigenous mythologies are living. They’re still actively shaping how billions of people understand reality.
The distinction matters. Dead mythology can be studied with academic detachment. A living mythology demands respect for those who still live by it.
Acknowledge Indigenous Frameworks
Whenever possible, use the terms cultures use for their own narratives.
Itihasa instead of “Hindu epics.” Purana instead of “Hindu mythology texts.” Dreamtime instead of “Aboriginal mythology.” Orisha instead of “Yoruba myths.”
Language is an act of respect.
What Mythology Is: My Working Definition
After all this, here’s the definition I work with:
Mythology is the narrative framework through which cultures encode existential truths, ethical principles, and ways of being that are not reducible to empirical fact but are nonetheless real and vital for human flourishing.
Mythology is:
- Philosophy in narrative form
- Psychology in symbol
- Ethics in archetype
- Cultural memory in story
Mythology is not:
- Primitive science
- Childish fantasy
- Historical error
- False belief
Mythology is how humans have always grappled with the questions that matter most. And in a world increasingly dominated by technological rationality and empirical measurement, mythology remains essential.
Because not everything that’s real is measurable. Not everything that’s true is provable. And not everything that matters can be reduced to data.
Conclusion: Mythology as Living Knowledge
What is mythology?
It’s not what dictionaries say though their definitions capture fragments.
It’s not what Western academics have decided though their frameworks offer useful tools.
Mythology is how cultures preserve what science cannot contain. It’s how humans have always encoded insights about power, identity, suffering, transformation, and meaning.
And when I work with these narratives, when I excavate the Goddess tradition, when I write about the Devi Mahatmyam, when I insist on calling myself a mythology activist rather than a writer I’m doing more than retelling stories.
I’m arguing that these frameworks are not relics. They’re resources. They’re not past. They’re present. They’re not myths (falsehood). They’re mythology (meaning).
And that distinction, small as it seems, changes everything.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is mythology in simple terms?
A: Mythology is the collection of traditional narratives (myths) that a culture uses to make sense of existence, explain origins, and convey ethical and philosophical truths. These stories often feature gods, heroes, or supernatural elements and address fundamental questions about life, death, suffering, and meaning. Unlike history, which aims to document events, mythology aims to preserve insights.
Q2: Is mythology the same as religion?
A: No. Religion is institutionalized practice beliefs, rituals, priests, temples, doctrines. Mythology is the narrative substrate that religion often draws from. You can study Greek mythology without practicing ancient Greek religion (which no longer exists as a living tradition). However, for living religions like Hinduism, Shinto, or Indigenous traditions, mythology and religion are interconnected, and the myths are still considered sacred.
Q3: What does mythology mean in different cultures?
A: Different cultures don’t use the word “mythology” for their own narratives. In India, epics are called Itihasa (“it happened thus”) and cosmological texts are Purana (“ancient knowledge”). Aboriginal Australians speak of Dreamtime. Yoruba tradition refers to Orisha. The term “mythology” is a Western category imposed on these narratives, often implying they’re fictional when the cultures themselves understand them as truth.
Q4: Why is Greek mythology so popular compared to other mythologies?
A: Greek (and Roman) mythology became central to Western education because it was preserved through European classical scholarship and integrated into Christian education as “pagan literature.” It was taught in universities, referenced in literature, and became foundational to Western cultural literacy. Other mythologies Indian, African, Indigenous were often labeled “primitive” by colonial powers and excluded from mainstream education, though this is changing.
Q5: Is Indian mythology real or fake?
A: This question assumes a false binary. If by “real” you mean “did every event happen exactly as described in empirical, historically verifiable ways,” then no. If by “real” you mean “does it convey genuine insights about consciousness, ethics, power, and existence,” then yes. Indian texts like the Ramayana and Mahabharata were called Itihasa (“history”) by those who preserved them, though not history in the modern Western sense. They’re mythologically true addressing existential realities.
Q6: What is the difference between myth and mythology?
A: A myth is a single traditional narrative. Mythology is either the collection of myths from a culture or the academic study of myths. Additionally, in modern English, “myth” often means “false belief” (as in “that’s just a myth”), while “mythology” is more neutral, referring to systems of meaning-making narratives. For more, see my article on mythology vs myth.
Q7: Why do we still study mythology today?
A: Mythology addresses questions that empirical science cannot answer questions about meaning, purpose, ethics, suffering, and identity. In an age dominated by technological rationality, mythology offers frameworks for understanding human experience that are holistic, symbolic, and existential. Additionally, mythology shapes contemporary culture (literature, film, art) and understanding it provides cultural literacy. For billions of people, mythology is still a living framework, not just historical curiosity.
Q8: Can new mythologies be created in modern times?
A: Yes, though they usually build on older patterns. Contemporary myth-making includes superhero narratives (Marvel, DC), science fiction universes (Star Wars, Star Trek), and fantasy epics (Lord of the Rings, Game of Thrones). These function mythologically offering archetypes, exploring good vs. evil, providing meaning frameworks. However, modern “mythologies” often lack the sacred dimension of traditional ones, operating more as entertainment than as religious or philosophical systems.
Continue Your Journey
Want to explore how mythology preserves cultural truth?
Read my comprehensive guide: Mythology: Beyond Stories, The Meaning-Making Framework That Shapes Cultures
Interested in how colonial frameworks distorted Indian narratives?
Discover: Why ‘Hindu Mythology’ Is a Colonial Term (And What We Should Say Instead)
Ready to dive deep into the Goddess tradition?
Explore my book: Mahadevi: The Unseen Truth Behind Existence – Reclaiming the Divine Feminine from patriarchal erasure.
About the Author
Priyanka Sharma Kaintura is a mythology activist, author, and speaker dedicated to separating myth from mythology. After two decades in corporate communication, she now writes full-time, focusing on excavating narratives especially feminine ones that have been buried by patriarchy and colonialism. Her books include Mahadevi: The Unseen Truth Behind Existence and My Jiffies: Narration of Moments, Unadulterated and Unpackaged.
She believes accurate and opportune communication is the plinth for most of what goes right in the world, and precise storytelling is a pressing priority.
Read More About Priyanka | Explore Her Books | Subscribe to Newsletter
